-
Catch Up
Follow Us!
Gallery Quick Link
Me on twitter
- 'Zurich - Manchester is certainly not. ' 32 minutes ago
- Photo “City Living” @3LeggedThing @Sigma_Photo @KazutoYamaki http://t.co/TJTY6Gop #photography 9 hours ago
- By heck, it ain't half cold up north. 15 hours ago
Monthly Archives: February 2009
The Presets | Live @ The Rainbow, Birmingham |
A while ago my phone rang, It was Carlo Solazzo from the 444 club in Birmingham, The Presets are coming. I packed my bag, headed for the Rainbow and got some cracking photos. Oh, and the date of the call was the 2nd of July 2008 and one of Birmingham’s best unsigned bands, Deluka, were supporting.
-
-
“The Presets revel in the darker, more cosmic realm of dance music while still having fun and involuntarily getting people in the mood to move. There’s also punk and new wave elements, but just dont call them “indietronica”. – Rolling Stone
“Their set wonderfully straddles the line between a traditional rock show and DJ set… the entire venue dashed and jumped around like, well, ravers in a friendly mosh pit.” URB “This is the dance record of the Summer” 4/5 THE SUN
Kimberley Isaac Moyes was but a young man, small of stature but big of heart, down on his luck, doing the odd performance in a downtown gay bar and eating anchovies from tin cans discarded in the alley behind a local Italian restaurant, putting all his dollar bills in a pillow, with the dream to one day have enough money to buy a Moog synthesiser.
Julian Hamilton was the new bus boy in said food joint, robust and ambitious, taking out the trash and sweating like a malaria ravaged wrestler when he one day chanced upon poor Kim out the back, sucking on those oily little fish like hed never tasted such a delicacy.
These encounters out the back of Luigis Linguini And Pasta Allsorts became regular, and led to the occasional lunch date, when Julian would not only smuggle Kim a fresh can of anchovies, but would even share his own chef-cooked meal. The boys found friendship over faggotini, had leisurely lunches scheming up ways for Kim to stay one step ahead of the Child Protection Services who longed to send the delinquent off to an orphanage in Mongolia, they dreamed of the myriad ways Julian could swindle his evil boss Luigi, and held heated debates about their shared passion, music.
It was in these early days that Kim and Julian realized their meeting had been fateful, and that one day they would make good on their shared desire to make moody, crisp electronic future pop.
If youve ever wondered what they might play when youre standing there staring at the fork in the road between heaven and hell, this could be it.
Joss Stone | live Photos from the Rainbow – Birmingham |
Live from The Rainbow in Digbeth | 444 club |
Return to the Main Page
Last Friday, the 444 promoters at the Rainbow landed what turned out to be a stunning show, faultless and flawless. But then again, it was Joss Stone playing to under 300 people. A rare and special event.
The trio of small venue “warm-up” show were announced last friday, It’s thought Joss booked the shows to preview songs from her upcoming fourth album ‘Colour Me Free’, which Stone hopes to release in April. (see photos for set list)
“Joss, who performed bare foot, of course, was a hit with the crowd and enjoyed every minute of her performance.”
The trio of small venue “warm-up” show were announced last Friday, It’s thought Joss booked the shows to preview songs from her upcoming fourth album ‘Colour Me Free’, which Stone hopes to release in April. (see photos for set list) Joss Stone has sold more than 7.5 million albums worldwide; been nominated for four Grammy Awards; appeared onstage with James Brown, The Rolling Stones, Stevie Wonder, Elton John, Patti Labelle, Mavis Staples, Donna Summer, and Smokey Robinson; sat for an interview with Oprah Winfrey; starred in two major ad campaigns for the Gap; and performed for more than 200,000 people at the 2005 Live 8 Concert in London — all before reaching the ripe old age of 19. Now 21, she is getting “Back to Basics”
“It was quite a surprise last minute gig which prompted a barrage of calls from excited fans asking whether the rumours were true”, says Christina Savvas from The Birmingham mail. Her review also goes on to note that “Expectations were high; after all we were among a select audience for the 21-year-old who these days is more used to performing in front of thousands.” “Fans had a treat because the singer and her fabulous nine-man band and backing singers performed a 75 minute set including hit singles You Had Me and Super Duper Love and new material such as Free Me – her voice was spot on.”
“The audience loved her, and what’s not to love – Joss is blessed with stunning looks, a fun persona and a strong, distinctive, sexy voice, which is second to none.” The review in the paper gave her a 4/5, I would love to know why the full 5/5 was not awarded. I would also like to point out that this was not only a great show for Joss, but a another fantastic show hosted out of Digbeth. Venues such as the Rainbow are really starting to stand loud and proud. Its something that everyone in Birmingham should be proud about. So 5/5 for Carlo Solazzo and all the gang for making all this happen.
Click here for the Full Gallery
Tour dates:
23 – Birmingham The Rainbow
25 – Leeds TJs (Woodhouse Liberal Club)
28 – Liverpool The New Picket
Tagged 'Colour Me Free, 2004 Mercury Prize, 444 club, actress, Angie Stone, Betty Wright, birmingham, Body & Soul, carlo Solazzo, Digbeth, Elton John, English soul, Eragon, Grammy Awards, James Brown, Jocelyn Eve Stoker, Joss Stone, joss stone in birmigham, joss stone photos, Mind, New York Post, R&B, Raphael Saadiq, Relentless, S-Curve, Showtime, singer-songwriter, soul singer, Stevie Wonder, stunning show, The Rainbow, The Rolling Stones, The Roots, The Soul Sessions, The Tudors, Virgin
Skyhook TV | EuroDip Stop Frame Animation Project
Text is lifted from The Skyhook Blog.
Film Trailer:
(now stepping back in time to November 08…)
Today I was preparing for shooting the animation scenes that would represent a big step towards the long-overdue completion of my first full-length bike film, EuroDip.
It was a while back that I wanted to have a crack at animation, and below is the result of my first attempt at storyboarding one of the sequences (which was never made in the ends, as it happens). So with car and bike pictures, and South Park characters printed out and cut to size, and using a couple of pencils, a packet of sweets for the car boot and an apple to imitate the sunset, me and Dave went for it.
Unbelievably bad-looking? Yes. Useful to have done? Definitely.
Moving on a few months then, I had more of an idea of what the animation scenes would entail.
They involve two model cars (vans in fact) that move along a large old map of Europe by way of stop-frame animation, and thus represent the journeys that were made on the trip. It’s a nice way to break up the different sections of the film, and add a little bit of production value in there too.
Thanks to Birmingham University geography department for trusting me with an old a probably valuable piece of cartography.
The hire car we had on the trip was a black Ford Galaxy which wasn’t too hard to source as a model on Ebay, but the Howies van, a white Toyota Hi-Ace was not so easy to find. So had to settle for the next best thing, a VW Sharan, and paint white over the back windows. This was not quite as simple as it sounds, but luckily I had the services of aerosol art extraordinaire and ambassador of all things Black Country, Stuart Styles to my semi-disposal.
Just masking the model was effort enough, then making sure the paint did not go on so thick as to run was a fair job.
Once it was drying, I went to get custom mini-prints of the howies logo to stick on the van. This was hassle again, but thanks to a friend of Stuart and his trusty CAD / cutting machine, it was sorted and looking good.
With everything ready it was time to head home, ready for a long shoot tomorrow…
We had to transport an impressive amount of kit to Miles and Stuart’s office for this shoot.
- One video camera,
- 2 digital SLRs,
- one large map,
- 2 tripods,
- one desktop computer,
- remote flash and a white umbrella.
- Coffee (Dave)
It took an hour or so to set up, then over the next 9 hours we took a total of 780 photos, most of which were taken whilst I was in very uncomforable positions, as I had to move both cars minute distances for each shot, then roll out the way so as not to get in the way of the flash, roll back in again, and so on.
The easiest shots were the ones where the camera was locked off on the tripod and the model vans moved into, or out of shot.
Harder shots included tracking shots where the camera was moving along with the models so they appeared still, with the ground moving underneath. It was important here to make sure the wheels of the models moved for every shot, otherwise it would have looked cack and unrealistic.
But the hardest shots (like the title sequence) involved a combination of tracking shots and movements away from the models to show a larger area of the map. This was particularly hard because in addition to making sure the models were moving the right distance each time (my job), Dave had to move away with the camera for each shot whilst keeping the models in the same place on screen.
One sequence was imitating us travelling at night, so we had to try and get a different kind of light on the map. I used my Pag camera light with the dichroic filter to give the light a blue-ish look.
Over the following weeks, Dave pulled off some pixel-magic with After Effects. We layed a clip of blank super-8 footage (thanks to www.videocopilot.net) over the top of the sequences to give them a bit of an old feel.
Dave also digitally super-imposed headlights and brakelights onto the models for the night time shot. I’ve no idea of how he did it exactly – i found it best not to ask but rather just let him get on with it!
The night time sequence:
And the intro / title sequence:
So glad to have this film complete – work is now beginning one editing the second bike film which was a road trip through Southern California and Nevada. I aim to have it done and finished in 3 to 4 months!
Tagged aerosol art extraordinaire, After Effects, ambassador of all things Black Country, animation, Birmingham University geography, blank super-8 footage, dichroic filter, digitally super-imposed, EuroDip, Film Trailer, Howies, Howies van, model cars, old map of Europe, Pag camera, Skyhook, stop-frame animation, Stop-Motion, Stop-Motion Animation Project, Stuart Styles, Toyota Hi-Ace, VW Sharan
Hiring a Creative Professional? Read Up!
HIRING A CREATIVE PROFESSIONAL FOR YOUR WEDDING?
— all content by Meghan McEwen for The Wedding Photojournalist Association - http://www.wpja.com/
Like many brides and grooms, your wedding could be the first time you’ll be hiring a creative professional. You might think the ins and outs of working with a wedding photographer are as simple as writing a check. What could be so difficult, right? But just ask any talented pro, and you’ll get a grateful explanation of why it’s so important to truly understand their creative process.
How you manage your relationship with a wedding photojournalist can have just as profound an impact on the photographs as the day unfolding before the camera. Luckily, you and your photographer both want the same outcome: amazing photos that capture the feeling of the wedding day.
“One of the best things about being a wedding photojournalist is that….one can capture life as it happens without restraint,” WPJA award-winner David Crane says. “At a great wedding everyone wants me there, wants me to capture those fleeting moments, and will appreciate them for years to come.” Learn how to be one of those couples. Our award-winning wedding photojournalists offer their best advice on getting the most out of your photographer.
FOCUS ON THE CREATIVITY, NOT THE BUSINESS
Wedding photographer Dave Cheung recommends focusing less on the business process and more on the creative one when you’re working with a wedding photojournalist. Of course, you’ll both sign a contract, and ultimately there will be details relating to the types of packages purchased, the number and format of proofs, schedule, costs, and possibly album design, but that should all be secondary when it comes to selecting and working with your creative professional.
Cheung advises that when it comes to hiring a wedding photojournalist, one should not get bogged down with comparing the details of various packages. “It doesn’t matter how many pictures you’re going to get if you don’t first understand how he or she is going to capture your wedding day,“ he states. After all, what difference does it make if you’re getting 100 proofs or 500, if you don’t love the photographs?
Once you’ve made your decision, remember to take care of all those pesky business details before the wedding day arrives. Your photographer needs to be truly present, prepared to capture your moments, and not preoccupied with tracking the types of photographs he’s taking or worrying about collecting payment.
FEED YOUR WEDDING PHOTOJOURNALIST WELL
Even the hardest working photographers need to eat. You know that woozy-can’t-think-straight-lightheaded feeling you get when you haven’t eaten, and you’re on your feet all day? One of the last people you want feeling this way at your wedding is the person with the responsibility of capturing your most special moments for posterity.
Of course, you’re busy with all of the planning, but remember that your photographer will be with you all day, capturing every graceful move, and unless you think ahead to arrange a hot meal, he or she, or an assistant, may have to physically leave the premises in order to eat. It’s just another tiny detail among hundreds, but this one is worth remembering.
WPJA award winner Matt McGraw feels so strongly about this point that he designed his contract to clearly state he needs time to eat. “I’m with you all day long,” says McGraw. “You might as well give me some food…some good food. Not a croissant sandwich and some chips.”
DON’T DIRECT
This is the biggest pet peeve of wedding photojournalists far and wide: brides, grooms, parents, reception coordinators, bridesmaids, DJs and various other guests who give constant direction about what, when and how to photograph the wedding. “Of course I’m going to photograph the flowers and capture the beautiful sunset,” McGraw says. “It’s my job.”
No photographer likes to be given constant art direction. Remember: you’ve hired a wedding photojournalist, because they don’t style photographs. Not only is it annoying, but perpetual third-party direction also takes away from the creative element of documentary style wedding photography. Directing is the antithesis of the natural, unscripted moment. And, as McGraw adds, the more art direction brides and grooms are giving, the less they are enjoying their wedding—and the fewer natural moments there are to photograph.
When there is too much direction, Crane admits to missing moments. “I approach each wedding with no pre-conceived ideas. I let the day unfold before my lens and capture what happens. If I am backed into a portrait-a-thon it never fails that I see real images unfolding out of the corner of my eyes and there is nothing I can do about it. The clients hired me for my ability to capture those honest fleeting moments and I am missing them because I am shooting every possible combination of bride, groom and family,” he says.
COORDINATE WITH OTHER CREATIVE VENDORS
Often times, brides and grooms don’t think about coordinating the styles of all of the other creative pros they’ve hired to cover their wedding. “Make sure all the creative individuals you’re employing are on the same page. If you like your photographers because they’re behind the scenes, and that’s why you hired your photographer, then make sure that approach is also going to work with your videographer,” McGraw suggests.
If the videographer has a style that involves a lot of direction (like making you put on your dress five times), that may not create the best situation for a wedding photojournalist who doesn’t take any staged shots. The creative pros, says McGraw, don’t need to be able to work together, per se, but they should all have a shared understanding of how the day is going to unfold. He suggests asking your vendors direct questions about their process, such as “Are you going to ask me to button up my dress three times?
He also recommends letting all of your other vendors know about your photographer’s style. That way, they won’t be interrupting or trying to pose shots for her.
TRUST YOUR WEDDING PHOTOJOURNALIST
“We’re not selling a product, we’re selling a promise,” says Cheung, who considers trust the single most important part of wedding photojournalism. “If you don’t trust your wedding photojournalist, then why did you hire them?”
If you’re constantly worrying about the photographers—are they getting good shots; taking enough pics; Do I look good?—then you’re not living in the present. “When you let that go,” says Cheung “the imagery is much more confident, because you’re not thinking about it the entire time. You can’t worry. If you’re being primped and prompted at every turn, you’re not going to enjoy your day, and the photos will reflect that.”
Cheung says you have to be comfortable enough in front of your photographer to cry, and trust them to document that in a beautiful way. After all, he says, you don’t have to look good every second of the day. “You just have to trust that wedding photojournalists are artists and thereby trust their vision of your day,” Cheung says.
YOU CAN’T CONTROL EVERYTHING: ACCEPT IT
Trust is also closely related to giving up control. Part of trusting your photographer is being able to hand over the reigns. Accept that you cannot control everything; that’s why you hire professionals to carry out a shared creative vision. Realize that when you try to control too much, you’re actually hijacking the creative process.
For example, McGraw is not a fan of the list. “The family list is fine,” he says. “But not the lists of all the moments: the candles, the garter toss, the bride walking down the aisle.” McGraw once received a four-page list, down to the silverware on the table. “It was beyond duty,” he says, “And I was just going down, checking off the list.”
If you give a wedding photojournalist too long of a to-do list, it distracts them from what you hired them to do in the first place: shoot spontaneous, once-in-a-lifetime moments that can’t be predicted, and therefore, could never be included on a list.
“I don’t want to think about all these expectations,” says McGraw. “I just want to tell the story.”
— all content by Meghan McEwen for The Wedding Photojournalist Association - http://www.wpja.com/
Photo by Dave Kai Piper
Tagged birmingham, brides and grooms, capturing, CREATIVE PROFESSIONAL, Dave Piper - Latest Work, documentary style wedding photography, love the photographs, once-in-a-lifetime, photographer, photographs, shared creative vision, shoot spontaneous, TRUST YOUR WEDDING PHOTOJOURNALIST, WEDDING, Wedding photographer, wedding photojournalist, working photographers
D90 – The Newbie!
D90 – The Newbie!
Ken Rockwell explains!
The Nikon D90 is a fantastic camera. It’s Nikon’s newest and best DX format DSLR. I prefer it to the old D300, which costs almost twice as much. That’s the way it goes with digital cameras: new is almost always better, even for much less cost. The D90 has identical, or slightly better technical image quality than the D300, the exact same rear LCD, and adds several very useful ergonomic features for faster handling compared to the D300. These handling improvements will let you react faster to conditions, meaning you’re more likely to get better pictures by being better prepared.
If you’re considering a D300, forget it. Get the D90 instead.
The Nikon D90 is Nikon’s newest and smartest DSLR. It has the same or better technical image quality as the D300 that costs much more, and it handles better and it makes movies, too!
The D90 is newer and better than the D300, for a fraction of the price, so long as you prefer the D90′s lighter plastic body. Let’s be honest: I’ve used my plastic D40 for years and it still works like new, so I don’t see any reason to pay more for a D300′s metal body unless you’re shooting sports all day. All these cameras have metal lens mounts and are built to very high standards.
The more I use the D90, the more I like it. Compared to the old D300, the D90 offers the same or better image quality, with many new features, in a lighter plastic package with the same vivid and accurate 3″ LCD and a much improved rear multi selector for faster handling. The D90 also has better ergonomics than the D300 and D3, so it’s easier to get where you want in the menus faster.
The D90 is super easy to use. As Nikon’s newest camera incorporating over 60 years of continuous innovation, it’s got more clever features, like a multiple-shot self timer, and a 25-image and calendar display if you keep zooming out on playback, than any other Nikon to date. It all works intuitively, and unlike the D3 and D300, I can operate everything with one hand. I have to waste a frame to shoot a picture to get it to play images if I can’t hit the PLAY button, but I can get to all the menus and everything when set up as I like it in just one hand.
The only thing I miss from the more expensive D3, D700 and D300 are the option to set instant zoom on playback when hitting the OK button, and I do miss the 5:4 aspect ratio crop from the D3.
For you techies, as you can see at my Nikon D90, D3, D300 and D200 Sharpness Comparison, for use in daylight, the D90 renders images identical to the $5,000 Nikon D3. Of course the D3 shoots faster for sports, but the images are as good, the rear LCD is identical, and the D90 has a few new convenience features that weren’t invented back when the D3 came out.
Also for you techies, in my Nikon D90, D3, D300 and D200 ISO 3,200 Comparison, I discovered that the Nikon D90 is even a bit better in low light than the $1,800 D300.
The D90 is worlds beyond the old first-generation D80, which it replaces as Nikon’s mid-line DSLR.The Nikon D90 is a D80 with Live View, ADR, an almost three-dimensional 3″ LCD, it can shoot movies, and has far more advanced ergonomics.

Top, Nikon D90
(prototype with integrated WiFi; production model has no WiFi unless you use an Eye-Fi card, and then only for transferring files, not web browsing on the rear LCD).
The D90 works perfectly with all traditional AF, AF-I, AF-D and AF-S lenses.
No metering or EXIF data with manual focus lenses, you need at least a D300 to use these well. Then again, you always can guess exposure and correct based on looking at the LCD on playback, or play with it even faster in Live View, or you can buy a small light meter which will slip into the hot shoe.
The D90 has the same lens compatibility as the D80, D70, D100 and D50, which is better than the D40/D60, but worse than the D300.
The D90 provides automatic correction of lateral chromatic color fringes.
Details at Nikon Lens Compatibility.
Back, Nikon D90.
Finder: Pentaprism, 96% coverage, 0.94x magnification with 50mm lens, 19.5 mm eyepoint. Selectable 16-frame grid. Still a crappy, small finder compared to any film or FX camera: remember, the 96% coverage is of a frame only 0.65x the size of FX.
AF: 11 points. Multi-CAM 1000 AF module. Annoying AF assist illuminator.
Light Meter: 420 segment RGB Color Matrix with face detection. Center-weighted and spot for old-timers, too. Movie mode only uses Matrix.
Depth-of-field Preview: Yes.
Shutter: 1/4,000 ~ 30 seconds and Bulb. Full, half and third stops. If you use the optional $17 ML-L3 remote release, the Bulb position becomes an extremely useful Time setting, meaning the shutter opens on the first press, and stays open (for up to a half hour) until you press it again.
Shutter Death: Tested to 100,000 cycles during design, Nikon doesn’t share how many of them passed or failed that test. No big deal, Nikon’s warrantees have never had a mileage (shutter count) limitation.
Fastest Shutter Speed with Flash (sync speed): 1/200. No mention of the trick FP mode.
Built-in flash: 18mm lens coverage, Guide Number 17/56 (ISO 200, m/ft.), 12/40 (ISO 100). i-TTL flash control: works as commander controlling up to two groups of remote flashes.
Flash Compatibility: i-TTL (SB-400, SB-600, SB-800, SB-900 and R1C1).
Sensor: 12.3 MP CMOS DX (15.8 x 23.6 mm). Sensor cleaner.
ISO: 100-6,400. ISO 200 ~ 3,200 come up the usual way, while ISO 100 is ‘cyrpted as “Lo 1″ and ISO 6,400 as “Hi 1.”
Still Image Sizes: 4,288 x 2,848 (L), 3,216 x 2,136 (M) and 2,144 x 1,424 (S).
Still Image Formats: JPG, NEF, or both.
Motion Picture Formats: 1,280x720p/24, motion JPG .AVI for great frame-to-frame editing. Also 640×424 and 320 x 216 pixels. No word yet about variable frame rates, 23.98, genlock or variable shutter angles, probably not.
Longest Movie Scene: Up to the least of 2GB, or 5 minutes in 720p or 20 minutes in SD or 320.
Longest Movie Shooting before a break: One hour before the D90 gets too hot..
Storage: SD and SDHC cards.
Video out: HDMI and composite analog (NTSC or PAL).
LCD: 3,” 640 x 480. BM-10 condom (clear removable cover).
Power: Standard EN-EL3e battery (D80, D200, D300, D700, etc.). Rated 850 shots with 50% flash.
Size: 5.2 x 4.1 x 3.0 in. (132 x 103 x 77 mm).
Weight: 1 lb. 6 oz. (620 g), stripped naked like abandoned cars in the Bronx (no battery, no card, no lens, no cap, no strap and no monitor cover).
Included (can vary by area, especially if you order from any store in Brooklyn):
EN-EL3e battery
MH-18a charger
DK-5 eyepiece cap
DK-21 Rubber Eyecup
UC-E4 USB cable,
EG-D2 AV cable,
AN-DC1 Strap
BM-10 LCD Monitor Cover
Body Cap
BS-1 Accessory Shoe Cover (don’t you love these Japanese designations?)
Software CD
Nikon ViewNX browsing and editing software, which also does raw (NEF) image adjustments and conversions. This is good; Nikon View is one of the very few decent pieces of software from Nikon.
Optional Accessories: See my Nikon D90 Accessories page.
Announced: 27 August 2008.
Shipping Since: Early September 2008.
Nikon Product Number: 25446 (body only), 25448 (kit with 18-105mm).
Price: November 2008: $890, body only. August 2008: $999 USA (€ 899), add $300 for the plastic 18-105mm kit lens.
Marketing: 16 page brochure. The photo examples suggest that buying a D90 will earn you a lot of young, colorful, outgoing and active friends. No photos are credited. As usual, most of the example shots are made with lenses like the 85mm f/1.4, 14-24mm f/2.8 and 24-70mm f/2.8 that each cost as least as much as the D90 body alone and weigh several times as much, and would never be carried by someone young and exciting.
Notice that you will never, ever see anyone in a brochure sitting in front of a computer screen dicking with raw images. All you will see is skateboarding and bicycling, and the only time you’ll see a person portrayed as cool with any electronic device is if Apple is trying to sell them iPods, or a cell phone company is trying to push wireless devices, which do cause cancer. You also will never see anyone holding a camera, unless it’s a camera ad. Cameras and electronics are not cool. Dealing with people in person and participating in, not watching, active sports is where it’s at.
Nikon D90. enlarge.
The D90 works great. I can’t find any real flaws, just the occasional small feature not present on more expensive cameras.
Ergonomics
The D90 handles great. I’ll be writing a complete users guide, and if you know how to shoot Nikon, the D90 will be the easiest camera yet.
It’s super easy to use. As Nikon’s newest camera with over 60 years of continuous innovation, it’s got more clever features than any other Nikon to date. For instance, you can use the dials to zip through setting the clock, and it all works intuitively.
The rear multi-selector is greatly improved over the D300. Call me silly, but I use this control a lot as I shoot, so having a good one as on the D90 means a lot to me compared to the mushy thing on the D300.
Image Quality
Exposure Metering
The meter seems identical to the D300 and D3. The defective meter of the D40 and D80, which often overexposed, is gone.
On the D90, D300, D700 and D3, I usually shoot at 0.0 exposure compensation, or often at -0.7 compensation outdoors if I’m shooting in VIVID picture control with +3 saturation. Forget me, just look at your LCD, and change the compensation (the +/- button near the shutter) for your next shot if your pictures are too dark or too light.
Flash Metering
As we Nikon users expect, flash metering is perfect. Pop up the built-in, and you get perfect fill light outdoors, or as the only source of light indoors.
Of course using the flash a the only source of light indoors looks crappy with black backgrounds, just as any other time you use
Technical Quality (for pixel counters)
As expected, the technical quality is as good or better than older, more expensive Nikons like the D3, D700 and D300 under the right conditions.
See my Nikon D90, D3, D300 and D200 Sharpness Comparison my Nikon D90, D3, D300 and D200 ISO 3,200 Comparison and my Nikon Camera Generations pages for examples.
Live View
I don;t use Live View. The manual warns at high temperatures it may only work 30 seconds at a time. A countdown timer will show on the screen if its getting ready to time out on you.
Nikon suggests an AF-S lens for AF during live view, not a traditional AF lens.
Speed
The D90 is fast, but not as fast as a D300, D700 or D3.
At 4.5 FPS, the D90 is almost as fast as the professional D1H was, and has four times the resolution.
Data
Data Transfer
The D90 has one design flaw: when plugged into a computer, it does not always appear directly as a hard drive, as other Nikon cameras do.
There is no USB menu option for PTP or mass storage. It s stuck in PTP, meaning if you want to plug the D90 to your computer, that you’ll need certain software or operating systems to recognize it.
it works fine on some computers, but doesn’t work on mine unless I futz with software, which I won’t do.
You may need to buy a separate SD card reader, or gamble installing Nikon’s always buggy software on your computer to download directly from the D90 if Apple’s Image Capture or other software doesn’t do it for you.
Default JPG DPI
JPGs default to 300 DPI, which is too bad, because I have to reset it to 72DPI before I drop text in for web use. I doubt anyone else would care, but I prefer how Canon DSLRs make images already dialed-in at 72DPI so my text looks right.
Autorotation
Vertical shots come up with rotated thumbnails in my Mac’s Finder. Just like all other cameras today, the images themselves aren’t rotated, unless you read the with the right software. I prefer to hard-rotate the images using the Lossless JPG Rotate command in iView, so they are always vertical, no matter what software is used to read them
Pointed straight down, it’s not uncommon for shots to be rotated incorrectly.
The rotation sensor is worse then the D3; it’s not unusual for it to get fooled. No big deal, it’s easy to right these later.
Playback
Playback works great, with all the usual Nikon tricks.
The only step backwards in the D90 is the new YRGB histogram display. Unlike the D3, D700 and D300, this page in the D90 wastes space with smaller histograms, and when you hit the MAG button, only uses the smaller area of the screen dedicated to the image to display the enlarged image.
I prefer the other cameras with larger color histograms. When I hit the mag buttons on the other cameras, the image blows up to fill the entire LCD, while the histograms evaporate.
The D90 does this with color histograms because, if you zoom and pan in the color histogram page, the histograms are only reading the area shown! That’s a nice parlour trick, and may help some people.
Particularly nice is that the multi-way button also lets us scroll diagonally, YAY!!
Distortion Correction
Unlike the excellent automatic correction of lateral color fringes, the lens distortion correction is a manual parlour-trick that is conjured up in the Playback Retouch menu.
Worse, distortion correction works, but not completely. The distortion correction is handy for quick “almost perfect” fixes, but not acceptable for serious use. For serious use, get either DxO or correct it in Photoshop.
The “Auto” position works OK, but I got better results with a manual in-camera adjustment. Neither was perfect; there’s still curvature.
Worse, just like Nikon’s other Retouch options, a design flaw in the D90 makes new, altered files with the wrong file names. The new, corrected files have file names which start with CSC, instead of DSC, so they don’t catalog correctly. If Nikon did this correctly, the new files would add suffices, like DSC-0123-edit-1.jpg
Movies are easy. Tap the rear Lv button to get Live View, and tap OK when you’re ready to roll.
That’s where the fun stops. There is no autofocus, so God forbid if anything moves (the whole point of a movie), because focus won’t track.
Since D90 can’t autofocus while shooting movies, they suck.
If you’re going to try to film anything that moves, the entire point of a movie, forget it. The “Live View” isn’t! The images on the rear LCD, just like every digital camera’s LCD, is delayed a fraction of a second. It will be very difficult to track and predict motion and action, since what you’re seeing on the LCD already is history by the time you see it. There is NO live finder, like a real SLR viewing on ground glass.
Unless you hire a Hollywood-bred Focus Puller and mount your D90 to a dolly and rig up that big white write-on calibrated external focus knob that the Focus Puller uses to pull focus from known point to known point as actors move between their known and rehearsed marks, your movies will be out of focus.
If you’re a DP (Hollywood Director of Photography), check out RedRock’s and Zacuto’s mount systems.
This is no problem for Hollywood, since theatrical movies have been shot with manual focus like this since the 1800s, but without a crew of four operators hovering around your D90, the results will be worse than from a point-and-shoot from Canon or Casio. Point-and-shoots focus while you’re shooting a movie, while the D90 is clueless.
Nikon’s USA User’s Guide, page 51, warns movies will have nasty tilts, banding, bends, and distortion if anything moves horizontally or if you pan. Even if nothing moves, the manual warns objects can have jagged edges, false colors, moiré and bright spots appearing before your eyes. So why bother with movies on the D90?
Movies are a kludge on the D90. They are such a kludge that when scrolling through the file EXIF info on playback in the D90, it all comes up blank! Nikon goofed, since AVI files have whatever data they have in different places than still image files, and Nikon didn’t get to writing the D90 firmware to display whatever is there properly. My 5-year-old Canon point-and-shoots display movie data properly, but not the Nikon D90.
The D90′s movies can’t do stereo and can’t do smooth power zooms either, as my Casio EX-V8 does, and the D90 certainly doesn’t fit in my pocket.
If you can get focus, you still can’t set exposure. Exposure seems to run off on its own. In dim light the D90 applies hellaicious amounts of noise reduction to the additional ISO it piles on.
Another gotcha about shooting movies with the D90 is that you have no viewfinder — whoops! It blacks out! You have to use the rear LCD like a common tourist, or mount a larger video assist on your dolly, using the video or HDMI outputs.
Another gotcha is that I see no mention of how long your shot can be, but other Nikons with Live View (the same technology used for movies) warn that you can’t do it for more than a few minutes at a time before the sensor overheats.
My video stinks, but if you have a crew and get anything good, the D90 shoots 720p/24 for theatrical release! Just call Ascent Media in Burbank to strike your prints. Nikon claims, probably correctly, that you’ll be getting much better results than an old-style camcorder because the sensor of the D90 is so much bigger.
What Nikon’s still camera division probably doesn’t realize yet is that the DX sensor is very close to the size of Hollywood 35mm movie film, which is a half of the frame that still photographers call “full-frame.” In the roughest terms, Hollywood shoots 18 x 24mm frames all day.
You Hollywood folks just need to hack your Zeiss and Panavision lenses and go, but if you use Nikon’s VR lenses, maybe your Steadicam rig can stay in its case. The flange focal distance is 46.5mm, so I’m unsure if it will be easy to adapt cine lenses to the D90.
In simple English for everyone else, unlike camcorders, you can throw backgrounds way out of focus for movies shot on the D90. The slow zoom kit lenses aren’t good for this, but pop on a 135mm f/2 DC or 300mm f/2.8 and see what happens. Heck, you now can steal back your Hollywood neighbor’s 300mm f/2 AI-s that he had converted to Arri mount and recombobulate it back to use on your Nikon!
24 FPS means movies will look like movies, presuming you shoot at 1/50 shutter speed. In bright light, shorter exposures will make things look a bit jumpy, and movies at 24 PFS are never as smooth as real video, which is shot at 60 fields per second. The video of the D90 can look like movies, but will never have the smooth fluid motion of regular camcorders.
Believe it or not, the jumpiness of theatrical movies is something for which professional video shooters pay FilmLook in Burbank (Hollywood) a lot of money to add back in!
Unlike a $250,000 Arriflex movie camera, the D90 records sound and has its own microphone. I don’t see any particular audio input or output jacks; it’s likely that unless the built-in mic does it for you, that you’ll have to treat this as MOS. Unlike the Casio EX-V8 which records in glorious stereo sound, the D90 appears to be mono only.
If I were Nikon, I’d shoot any TV commercials advertising the D90 on the D90. Hand this to someone in the ASC and he’ll get great results.
Works great with manual-focus AI-s lenses, in fact, they work better than the AF lenses!
Shows shutter setting, but ignores it. (Live view has the same idle screen, not knowing if you’re about the shoot a movie or a still)
Exposure Compensation, WB settings and Picture Controls all work in movie mode.
In daylight at f/.4, you can get poor images that flicker in and out slowly. If you see this, stop down or use an ND filter.
Image quality is limited by the data compression in 720p. Al the textures are lost even though edges stay sharp. IN hollywood, we refer to this making your video “look like cartoons,” which also have sharp edges but no textures.
Movie File Sizes, 10 second clips: 720p: 21.4MB. 480: 7.2MB. 320: 4.1MB.
Movie Image Quality:
320×216: Sharp, but that’s because its jaggy and aliased. It looks like a mistake! Wrong aspect ratio! No video uses 1.5:1.
640×424: Looks fine, but it’s the wrong aspect ratio! Its not 640×480, but only 640×424. There is no 1:1.5 aspect ratio on film or video anywhere, unless you’re trying to match the old double-frame Vista-Vision format! It’s sharp but aliased. I wouldn’t want to spend much time watching it.
1280×720: Soft, with textures smoothed over by compression.
Exposure: automatic, from daylight to dim light. It works pretty well.
Blooming: None, go ahead and point it at the sun if you dare.
320 x 216 file example (2 seconds, 789kB).
I didn’t tell you this, but with the right software (maybe even included with the D90 for all I know), you can pull single frames out of the 24 FPS video stream.
I know I can do it in iMovie. My Casio EX-V8 can do it in-camera. We’ll see with the D90.
Active D-Lighting (Adaptive Dynamic Range) for taming highlights and shadows. There’s a new “Extra High” mode for really nasty situations, and personally I’d just leave it in the Auto mode. If you’re a turkey, you can bracket pictures with and without ADR. Nikon doesn’t mention if this works for the video mode; I doubt it does but it would be awesome if it did.
Live View, with face-recognition AF.
Live View Focus Modes: Contrast-detection: Face priority AF automatically detects up to five faces and focuses on the closest, Wide area AF, and normal area AF used on a tripod.
Picture Controls similar to the D3, D700 and D300.
Scene Modes: Portrait, Landscape, Close-up, Sports and Night Portrait. The D90 is smart enough to know if VR is working and adjusts accordingly.
In-Camera Editing: The D90 adds Lens Distortion Correction and the ability to straighten horizons. There’s also a goofy Spherize mode to screw up images as if they were shot with a fisheye, but it won’t see any wider than the image did in the first place.
Playback Tricks: 72-frame playback, calendar playback and histogram display for a cropped portion of an image.
Gag me: “Pictmotion” menu creates slide shows combining five choices of both background music and image effects.
Silly Preset Scene Modes, like most less expensive cameras.
What’s Missing
What’s missing compared to the D300, D700 and D3 (not much!)
No ability to program the center OK button to zoom-in full-size in playback.
No options for JPG optimization.
No selection of NEF/raw characteristics.
No Shooting and Custom Setting Banks.
11 versus 51 AF points. I didn’t miss the extra 40, which are just in-between points.
No AF Area Mode switch; need to call this up in a menu (easy if you use the FUNC button to get to My Menu, and put this selection in My Menu.
No PC connector for studio flash. No big deal, I use the pop-up flash to trigger my studio strobes, or you can buy a hot-shoe to PC adapter.
Can’t program the Preview button to do tricks.
No ability to use a custom prefix, like KEN_0123.JPG, for the file names.
No Mirror-up mode. This mode sucks in the D3, D700 and D300 anyway.
WB/ISO/QUAL buttons shared with other functions, but still easier to use than the hidden ones on the D3, whose locations date from the F5.
No option for seeing the Focus Point Selection in playback, but who cares?
No Intervalometer (automatic timed shooting).
Can’t set ISO or exposure in full stops: ISO sets only in third stops, and exposure only in third or half stops.
No ability to change the focus and release priorities in the AF-S and AF-C modes.
No metering, finder read-out or EXIF data with manual-focus lenses. (buy a small light meter and a hot-shoe adapter if you can’t use the LCD to guess exposure.)
No macho-man metal body, so the D90 weighs much less. The D90 has a metal lens mount.
Maximum sync speed fixed at 1/250. (The D3, D700 and D300 can be set from 1/60 ~ 1/320 FP.) All these camera allow setting the slowest sync in P and A modes to any speed as slow as 30 seconds.
No compatibility with Nikon’s 1970s-inspired wireless transmitter.
No compatibility with Nikon’s expensive (like $500) Image Authentication software.
No ability to Save/Load camera settings and Picture Controls to an SD card.
No AF fine tuning, which I never use, and for most people, just lets then screw up a good thing.
No RESET option in Easy Exposure Compensation.
Only uses SD, not professional CF cards. This matters because SD cards don’t come in professional speed grades, like Lexar 300x and 233x and SanDisk Extreme IV, and because SD card readers aren’t available in Firewire to support those speeds. This means that it takes too long to download photos in the large quantities shot by pros. This is too bad, because the D90 is up to pro needs in every other way.
No 4:5 professional aspect ratio, but only the D3 does this.
What’s Weird
Compared to the D3, D700 and D300, the D90:
The FUNC button and Depth-of-Field Preview buttons are reversed.
When playing images with the ALL FOLDERS playback mode selected, instead of counting the images per folder (top right display might say 5/21), it counts as if all images on the card are in the same folder (top display might say 56/342). This gets confusing when images are in multiple folders.
The D90 has the option of five alphanumeric places for file names (better than the older D3, D700 and D300 which only have three digits and no letters), but there isn’t an easy option to create new folders incremented by one digit. Nice for naming files!
The D90 defaults to the wrong file-numbering convention. You need to remember to set Custom Setting d7 to ON to prevent starting file numbers from DSC_0001.JPG every time you format a card. (All other recent cameras do this by default.)
What’s Better (lots of new stuff!)
What’s better on the D90 than the D3, better than the D700 and better than the D300:
Easier selection of advance modes, frame rates, remote control and self timer, especially in the dark.
Works with the superior $17 ML-L3 wireless remote release.
ADR is on by default.
Adds the AF-A AF mode.
Easier Live View mode with dedicated button! The other cameras use the rotary top switch, which sucks!
Makes movies with sound. The D3 at least records sound alone, which the D90 can’t.
The AF Selector Lock is better designed so it won’t get knocked by accident.
The Self Timer can make multiple exposures, helping ensure everyone’s eyes are open in at least one of the shots.
Nikon finally fixed the design flaw where by default the Modeling Flash fired if you hit the Depth-of-Field preview button. Thank you Nikon!
The dials work during playback by default. In the other cameras, I have to look for a few minutes to find this option hiding in the Custom Settings > Controls > Customize Command Dials option.
By default, the D90 won’t shoot without a card. The D3, D300 and D70 default to the very dangerous DEMO setting which lets you happily shoot an entire wedding, look at each shot on the LCD in every display mode and zoom setting, and not realizing until the end of the day that you had no card in the camera!
Better than the D3 and Better than the D300:
Can call up the top item in My Menu with the FUNC button. This makes the D90 much faster to use, because I now can get into the menus and set everything with just one hand!
Dedicated rear INFO button.
ADR modes include AUTO.
The rear LCD Monitor-on times are selectable separately for Playback, Menus, the INFO panel and Image Review.
The D90 has both the My Menu menu and Recent Items Menus. (D3 and D300 lack the Recent Items menu)
Better than the D300
Far nicer rear multi selector. The D300 has a mushy single piece of crap, while the D3, D700 and D90 have much better two-piece controls with a separate center OK button.
Got less than $1,600 but more than $500 for a Nikon DSLR? Here’s your camera.
The ADR feature is a huge help in taming wild highlights and shadows, the new LCD, identical to the one on Nikon’s $5,000 D3, is incredible, and the expanded Picture Control options let me get state-of-the art image performance in a $999 camera. If you know how to turn these on and appreciate what they do (or want to make Hollywood movies cheap), get a D90.
The dedicated INFO button mirrors the ingenious new INFO modes of the D700, making the D90 a world leader in usability.
What about the D40?
If money makes any difference, forget the D90. Digital cameras are a rich man’s game. You don’t need to spend $999 every other year just because Nikon or some web site says so. If I was on a budget and didn’t shoot these cameras all day, every day, I’d never want anything other than the D40 for $499, complete with a great lens. I have no problem making great 20×30″ prints from my D40 and its dinky kit lens.
The reason to buy a D90 is for the many subtle extra features, like a depth-of-field preview button, and for the better pictures in most picture-taking situations afforded by the Auto ADR feature, which is always on by default.
If you know how to turn on all the hot stuff in the D90, like ADR and adjust the Picture Controls which are newer and more flexible than the D40, D60 and D80, by all means, get a D90. I hope to have a plain-English user’s guide to the D90 which will show you how to use all these great features, in which case, the D90 will be able to crank out more vivid colors and smoother skin tones than the D40.
What About the D80?
History! Forget it.
Get a D40 instead of a D80 if money is an issue. The D40 is 95% the same as the D80, except for a few minor features.
Each of these is much tougher (and heavier) than the D90 if you’re going to bang it around. Each is also much faster if you’re shooting a lot of sports.
The funny reality of the world today is that the newer D90 has identical technical image quality to the older D300 and $5,000 D3 in good light.
Paying more gets you more durability and faster focus and frame rates, but that’s about it. All these have the same superb LCD and image quality.
If you shoot in the dark, pro photographers first improve the light. If you can’t improve the lighting and need to shoot at high ISOs, the D700 and D3 are vastly superior to an DX camera.
Lens Suggestions top
The D90 works with every AF lens made since 1986.
The 18-105mm VR is a swell idea, and even the cheapest 18-55mm kit lens is also excellent.
The 18-200mm VR does everything; if you get it, you won’t need any other lenses unless you’re an ultrawide junkie like me.

For Movies: the Nikon Zoom-NIKKOR*ED 50~300mm f/4.5 (discontinued).
For serious motion picture use, you might want to find one of the discontinued Zoom-NIKKOR*ED 50-300mm f/4.5 lenses (try these direct links to the 50-300 at Adorama and eBay
). By serious, I mean Hollywood-style where you have four people operating the camera: there is no AF and no metering with manual lenses like this for hobbyists. I don’t know if this is that smart an idea, the D90 doesn’t provide the level of control demanded in Hollywood, but give it a try.
The 50-300mm f/4.5 ED was frightfully expensive new, selling for $3,000 at full discount at B&H Photo Video through the 1990s, and today they sell used for about $1,000 to $2,000. The advantage of the 50-300 ED for movie work is its long 6x zoom ratio and that zooming happens internally. It holds focus very tightly as zoomed, and its zoom ring is extremely smooth and well spaced for smooth zooms, even by hand.
The older non-ED 50-300 4.5 lens isn’t very sharp and its barrel expands and contracts with zooming, so I’d skip it. Skip either 50-300 for still shots; they don’t couple to the meter. Live view stops when a lens is removed, so the D90 may or may not be able to make movies with manual focus lenses like this, since they have no CPU contacts and therefore the D90 probably won’t recognize them. Try it and see.
Deployment
Be sure to get an excellent optional $17 ML-L3 remote release. It’s tiny enough to fit in the key pocket of your jeans, and works even better than a real cable release.
PLUG
I support my growing family through this website.
If you find this as helpful as a book you might have had to buy or a workshop you may have had to take, feel free to help me continue helping everyone.
If you’ve gotten your gear through one of my links or helped otherwise, you’re family. It’s great people like you who allow me to keep adding to this site full-time. Thanks!
If you haven’t helped yet, please do, and consider helping me with a gift of $5.00.
The biggest help is to use these links to Adorama, Amazon, B&H, Ritz and J&R when you get your goodies. It costs you nothing and is a huge help. These places have the best prices and service, which is why I’ve used them since before this website existed. I recommend them all personally.
Thanks for reading!
Ken
Gigbeth – Sugar Hill Gang | Kano | The Gullimots
The Young Knives, Million Empire, Stanton Warriors, Subfocus, Miles & Erica Hunt (The Wonder Stuff), Pete Jordan, Joetbot, Anathema, The Hair, Miccoli, DR. Meaker, and DJ Switch
Photo Gallery 2008
Click here for Non Flash based gallery
Tagged Anathema, Aristazabal Hawkes, Big Bank Hank, birmingham, Birmingham City Cycles, Digbeth, DJ switch, DR. Meaker, Fyfe Dangerfield, gigbeth, Gigbeth photos, Greig Stewart, heducation, janice long, Joetbot, kano, Master Gee, MC Lord Magrão, Miccoli, Miles & Erica Hunt (The Wonder Stuff), Million Empire, Pete Jordan, Stanton Warriors, Subfocus, sugar hill gang, The Gullimots, The Hair, the Young Knives, Wonder Mike













